Page 90 - Pure Life 39
P. 90

The Truth and Scope of al-ʿIlm al-Ḥuḍūrī … A. Hussain & M. Karimi (65


                  chair  is  in  contact  with  the  wall,’  it   phenomenon  is  essentially  a  broad
                  implies  that  the  chair  lacks  any           perspective  encompassing  the  myriad
                  awareness  of  this  interaction.  In  the      small beings that inhabit our surroundings
                  former  instance,  our  contact  is             (Corvez, 1990).
                  characterized  by  sensory  perception,         Conclusion
                  whereas  in  the  latter,  the  relationship    The  phrase  ‘knowledge  by  presence’
                  between the chair and the wall is purely        does  not  appear  in  the  works  of

                  a physical phenomenon.                          numerous philosophers, including those
                     Heidegger posits that the underlying         associated with the Milesian School, the
                  rationale for this distinction lies in the      Pythagoreans,     the   Eleatics,    the
                  fact that, in the initial scenario, human       Atomists,  the  Sophists,  as  well  as
                  beings  possess  an  awareness  of  their       Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, and thinkers
                  own existence, whereas the chair lacks          from  the  Hellenistic  period.  Within

                  any  such  self-awareness.  To  put  it         Islamic philosophy, Avicenna emerged
                  differently,  the  existence  of  the           as  the  first  to  explore  the  distinctions
                  individual necessitates the presence of         between  knowledge  by  presence  and
                  a  boundary  for  their  experience             knowledge by acquisition, particularly
                  (Khatami, 2000, pp. 44-57).                     in relation to an object's self-awareness.
                     Heidegger posits that Dasein does not          Ṣadr al-Muti'allihīn al-Shīrāzī, who
                  conceive of itself as a mere subjectivity       is  acknowledged  as  the  founder  of
                  or  an  isolated  'I,'  devoid  of  any         transcendental philosophy, engaged in

                  connection to objects. This perspective         extensive discourse on knowledge by
                  underpins  the  essence  of  human              presence, setting himself apart from his
                  existence as fundamentally intertwined          philosophical      and      theological
                  with  the  world.  The  formation  and          contemporaries. In the modern context
                  essence  of  Dasein  are  rooted  in  its       of  New  Transcendental  Philosophy,
                  situatedness within the world. The world        scholars  have  tackled  emerging

                  cannot be regarded as an external entity;       epistemological challenges by utilizing
                  rather, our existence is inherently reliant     the concept of knowledge by presence
                  upon  it.  Dasein's  being  is  inextricably    and  clarifying  its  various  roles.  A
                  linked  to  the  external  reality  that        prominent figure in this movement is
                  constitutes the world.                          ʿAllāma  Ṭabāṭabāʾī,  who  played  a
                     This philosopher posits that the initial     crucial     role     in     revitalizing
                  inquiry  regarding  the  phenomenon  of         philosophical  thought  and  advancing

                  existence  pertains  to  the  location  from    the  understanding  of  knowledge  by
                  which  we  can  attain  absolute  certainty     presence. The relevance of knowledge
                  about it. The response indicates that this      by presence is a clear and significant
   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95