Page 85 - Pure Life 39
P. 85

(



                  60  /   International Multidisciplinary Journal of Pure Life, 11(39), 2024
                    philosophical  concepts  such  as             myself,  and  closely  examining  my
                    ‘Essence’ and ‘Cause and Effect’ are          nature,  I  will  endeavor  to  obtain  by
                    some  examples  of  knowledge  by             degrees  a  more  intimate  and  familiar
                    presence  of  a  human  being                 knowledge of myself. I am a thinking
                    concerning his soul and its effects.          (conscious) thing, that is, a being who
                     In  this  regard,  the  late  Ṭabāṭabāʾī     doubts,  affirms,  denies,  knows  a  few
                  said, “The connection between powers            objects, and is ignorant of many—who

                  and    actions,   along     with    their       loves,  hates,  wills,  refuses,  who
                  association with the soul, is understood        imagines likewise, and perceives; for, as
                  through  both  knowledge  by  presence          I before remarked, although the things
                  and    knowledge      by    acquisition”        which I perceive or imagine are perhaps
                  (Ṭabāṭabāʾī, 2018, p. 67).                      nothing  at  all  apart  from  me  and  in
                     Based on the aforementioned points,          themselves,  I  am  nevertheless  assured

                  it  is  evident  that  both  knowledge  by      that those modes of consciousness which
                  presence and intuitive knowledge hold           I call perceptions and imaginations, in as
                  significant  and  crucial  importance  in       far  only  as  they  are  modes  of
                  the  epistemological  and  ontological          consciousness, exist in me. And in the
                  framework of ʿAllāma Ṭabāṭabāʾī.                little I have said I think I have summed
                     Descartes  has  placed  significant          up all that I really know, or at least all
                  emphasis on the concept of knowledge            that up to this time I was aware I knew”
                  by  presence,  as  well  as  on  intuitive      (Descartes, 1982, pp. 61-62).

                  knowledge. He considers knowledge by              Also, in Descartes' view, ‘intuition’ as
                  presence to be the foundational element         a foundation and basis for philosophical
                  of  his  philosophical  framework.  To          and true thinking is a rational insight that,
                  circumvent  doubt  and  solidify  his           just  like  sensory  perception,  is  directly
                  philosophical ideas, he requires a robust       perceived and causes inner certainty. This
                  and unassailable basis, which he finds          intuition  is  unquestionable  and  certain

                  in  knowledge  by  presence.  In  this          (Sanaei, 1997, p. 28).
                  context,  Descartes  articulates,  “I  will
                  now close my eyes, I will stop my ears,           1.2.   Truth and Error in Judgment
                  I will turn away my senses from their           ʿAllāma    Ṭabāṭabāʾī   addresses    the
                  objects,  I  will  even  efface  from  my       concepts of truth and error in judgment as
                  consciousness  all  the  images  of             they  pertain  to  a  specific  level  of
                  corporeal  things;  or  at  least,  because     perception. He has delineated four distinct

                  this can hardly be accomplished, I will         stages  of  perception,  asserting  that  the
                  consider them as empty and false; and           matters of truth and error are associated
                  thus,  holding  converse  only  with            with  the  fourth  stage.  According  to  the
   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90