Page 104 - Pure Life 40
P. 104

Moral Principles and Norms of Legislators… M. M. Chegini & F. Pourkeyvan (79


                  such  as  the  Islamic  Republic  of  Iran,     and Amanah (trusteeship)  (The  Quran
                  assess  the  practical  application  and        4:135),  into  parliamentary  standards
                  challenges  of  implementing  ethical           (Sachedina, 2001, p. 72).
                  norms     in   governance.     Historical         This  dual  approach  ensures  ethical
                  contextualization  further  enriches  the       guidelines align with both democratic
                  study  by  tracing  the  evolution  of          accountability        and         Shi’a

                  legislative  ethics  from  classical  Islamic   jurisprudential  values  (Moṭahharī,
                  teachings  to  modern  applications.  The       1985). As Anṣārī (2006) demonstrates
                  interdisciplinary approach, incorporating       in  his  analysis  of  Iran’s  post-
                  political  philosophy,  religious  studies,     revolutionary Majlis, codifying ethics
                  and  ethics,  ensures  a  well-rounded          is  only  an  initial  step;  sustained

                  analysis that contributes both theoretical      institutionalization            through
                  insights  and  practical  guidelines  for       mechanisms  like  the  Article  90
                  developing  ethical  codes  that  enhance       Commission       and     religious-legal
                  integrity,  transparency,  and  public  trust   oversight  bodies  remains  critical  for
                  in legislative institutions.                    enforcement (p. 167).
                                                                    This  paper  will  explore  the  moral
                  Professional  Ethics  Requirements
                  for Representatives                             obligations  and  potential  ethical

                  Given  the  fundamental  difference             challenges  faced  by  representatives  in
                  between the Islamic Republic of Iran’s          the  context  of  the  Islamic  Republic's
                  religious  democratic  system—which  is         parliamentary  system.  By  examining
                  rooted        in Wilāyah        al-Faqīh        these requirements, we aim  to lay the
                  (Guardianship of the Jurist) (Khomeini,         groundwork  for  the  creation  of  a
                  1971)—and  secular  political  systems          comprehensive  ethical  framework  for

                  where  religion  plays  no  formal  role        parliamentarians in Iran. Although this
                  (OECD, 2021), the code of conduct for           study focuses on the Iranian Majlis, the
                  Iranian  parliamentarians  must  be             insights  derived  from  this  code  could
                  carefully designed to reflect this unique       apply to parliamentarians globally.
                  hybrid  governance  structure.  While           Trustworthiness

                  comparative  research  suggests  the            Trustworthiness  is  a  key  moral
                  utility of adopting evidence-based anti-        obligation  for  members  of  parliament,
                  corruption  measures  from  secular             defined here as the careful management
                  democracies (IPU, 2020, p. 33), Islamic         of  state  resources  and  finances.  It
                  political  ethics  require  the  integration    involves safeguarding public funds and
                  of     Quranic       principles     such        avoiding     personal     misuse      of

                  as ’Adl (justice)  (The  Quran  4:58),          government  property,  such  as  using
   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109