Page 57 - Pure Life 39
P. 57

(

                  32  /   International Multidisciplinary Journal of Pure Life, 11(39), 2024
                  also in matters concerning oneself. For         based on real benefits and harms or true
                  example, in a lifestyle that consists of a      perfection  and  deficiency,  not  on
                  system  of  behavioral  preferences,  a         instinctual  pleasure  or  blind  social
                  person must be able to maintain their           approval.  In  decision-making,  if  a
                  freedom and independence in decision-           person’s criterion is personal taste and
                  making against emotions and not allow           desire, such a person acts emotionally,
                  religious  beliefs  and  values  to  be         and  their  choice  is  not  realistic.  This

                  managed by desires and emotions. In             person  does  what  they  want,  and
                  ‘decision-making,’      we     calculate        nothing other than this personal desire
                  benefits  and  harms.  But  the  question       influences  their  decision.  In  contrast,
                  that  arises  here  is  whether  this           another  person  bases  their  decision-
                  calculation is always done correctly. In        making  on  reason  and  truths,  not  on
                  other words, is it possible that in such        personal  taste  and  desires,  which  are

                  a calculation, the place of benefits and        valid only by their own standards.
                  harms is swapped?                                 Imam  Ali    said  in  this  regard,
                     Given that human behavior is based           “Indeed,  God  Almighty  has  endowed
                  on thoughts and emotions, the answer            angels  with  intellect  without  desire,
                  to  this  question  seems  to  be  positive     animals  with  desire  without  intellect,
                  because  it  is  possible  that  due  to        and  humans  with  both  intellect  and
                  incorrect  thoughts,  a  person  may  not       desire.  Therefore,  whoever’s  intellect
                  correctly identify benefits and harms,          prevails over their desire is better than

                  or the calculation of benefits and harms        the  angels,  and  whoever’s  desire
                  may  be  based  on  emotions  and               prevails  over  their  intellect  is  worse
                  feelings,  not  on  real  and  rational         than  the  animals”  (Ibn  Bābawayh,
                  benefits  and  harms.  Therefore,  the          2006, Vol. 1, p. 4).
                  issue  of  realistic  choice  arises  here.       In another saying, He stated, “Is there
                  Lifestyle is a type of choice that each         no freeman who can leave this chewed

                  person  makes  based  on  internal  and         morsel (of the world) to those who like
                  external  conditions  or  accepts  under        it?  Certainly,  the  only  price  for
                  social  pressure.  Thus,  as  it  can  be       yourselves is Paradise. Therefore, do not
                  created, it can also be changed, and the        sell yourself except for Paradise” (Sharīf
                  possibility  of  creativity  always  exists     al-Raḍī, Wisdom 456).
                  (Kāwiyānī et al, 2019, p. 19).                    Thus,  based  on  the  principle  of
                     By  ‘realistic  choice,’  we  mean  a        freedom,  our  choice  must  be  realistic.

                  choice  and  free  will  based  on  truths,     Therefore,  one  of  the  outcomes  of
                  not  on  subjective  or  arbitrary              believing in human free will is freedom
                  considerations.  In  other  words,  it  is      and self-respect. In contrast, determinism
   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62